We have enough DXInOne Marketers already, right? (Part 1)

Enough or Too Many?

by David Bennett, DXPowerTeam

In 2005, we saw marketers appear like popcorn. Everywhere you looked, someone had a product over DXInOne. Everyone seemed to suddenly know the system, and they are more than ready to explain it to you: for a price, or for free, through audio/video-based training, through Adobe documents, through support forums… You name it. Training everywhere.

Doesn’t make much sense

If there are so many training systems out there, then why aren’t enough reserves appearing to keep things smooth? Surely there should be a constant enough feed of fresh funds. There must be something else happening, right?

You are right. There is more to it than just the basic act of shepherding folks through the system. If it WAS that simple, then there wouldn’t be any problems with system volatility. Everything would be flowing along just fine.

All right. Sit back and mull that one over… and it shouldn’t take you long to peg on it:

Maybe it’s about just WHAT exactly the marketing sites are training over.

It’s what the marketing sites ARE training, on the whole. They are teaching their adherents, mainly, that this is a ‘cash production’ system. Namely, that everyone is supposed to be able to just add a few bucks, and forever make relatively consistent withdrawals.

They aren’t just saying ‘sometimes it works that way, (if) or (when) etc.’ And ‘sometimes it works another way, (if) or (when) etc.’

They are just plain telling you that you can add a few dollars and keep pulling out more and more as you go. At all times, mainly. No matter what is happening with system reserves.

Think of the biggest training systems during 2005, and think about what their training has been like. We dont mean their marketing pages – sure, everyone tends to market for best image. As far as that goes, marketing is marketing.

But marketing HAS TO BE counter-balanced by quality training. You have to be ready to be flexible in this system; to understand that the system is dynamic, and doesn’t just operate one way only.

In short, when is it possible to withdraw more than you put in? When the system is being marketed hard enough to drive more total e-currency/currency through the system than DXG in circulation. During THOSE times, we’re seeing ‘excess reserves’, which over 2005 were drained. Again, this issue existed also by the end of 2003, when we had to correct for that imbalance as well.

How it worked in 2005

During 2005, this is inevitably how it worked:

Many new members got in. And many older (senior) members already had cash in the system. Since everyone could buy digots using ‘old DXG’ directly to create ‘new DXG’, they surely did!

And what did they do with the cash they got from OutXchanges…?

You guessed it; they basically pocketed that cash.

They withdrew real money (reserves) consistently, while simultaneously creating more DXG by using their ‘old’ DXG.

In effect, many who had little funds to work with put funds through the system, and the system allowed those who were already vested to higher levels to extract that money.

I still remember Sharon Toberer excitedly talking about purchasing her husband a $10,000 electric car for his birthday, from DXG profits, because she thought ‘it was cute.’

Where do you think she got the $10,000 …? She had put some money (about $4000) in the system already. She was vested. When someone InXchanged $10,000 and it arrived in her account (this is just an example of the sort of usual thing that happened), she chose to cash that money out, and go on vacation, or make a purchase for the fun of it, or pay bills, etc. In this case, she bought an electric car (if I am remembering it correctly).